Tag: Mexican Supreme Court
-
Symposium on the Judicial Overhaul in Mexico Epilogue: Abusive Judicial Reform in Mexico
—Irene Parra Prieto, IACL-AIDC blog, Rosalind Dixon, University of New South Wales, & David Landau, Florida State University College of Law [Editors’ Note: This is the 9th entry, and the “Epilogue,” of a symposium on the recent constitutional amendments affecting the judiciary in Mexico.
-
Symposium on the Judicial Overhaul in Mexico Part 8: The Problem of the Amending or Revising Power and Its Constitutional Limits
—Imer B. Flores, Instituto de Investigaciones Jurídicas, UNAM [E]very constitution as a whole is a limit,constitutional government means limited government.Hilario Medina [Editors’ Note: This is Part 8 of a symposium on the recent constitutional amendments affecting the judiciary in Mexico. The introduction to the symposium can be found here.
-
Symposium on the Judicial Overhaul in Mexico Part 7: A Predicament of Its Own Making – On the Supreme Court of Mexico’s Conundrum on the Limits of Amendment Powers
—Jaime Olaiz-González, Universidad Panamericana (Mexico City)[1] [Editors’ Note: This is Part 7 of a symposium on the recent constitutional amendments affecting the judiciary in Mexico. The introduction to the symposium can be found here. The symposium pieces are cross-posted at ICONnect (in English) and at IberICONnect (in Spanish).
-
Symposium on the Judicial Overhaul in Mexico Part 6: The Future of the Mexican Supreme Court
—Alfonso Herrera, Universidad Panamericana & Universidad Iberoamericana (Mexico City) [Editors’ Note: This is Part 6 of a symposium on the recent constitutional amendments affecting the judiciary in Mexico. The introduction to the symposium can be found here. The symposium pieces are cross-posted at ICONnect (in English) and at IberICONnect (in Spanish).
-
Symposium on the Judicial Overhaul in Mexico Part 5: The Other Judicial Reforms in Mexico – Elected and Faceless Judges, Military Personnel with Investigative Tasks, and Mandatory Pre-Trial Detention
—Sandra Serrano, Researcher at IIJ-UNAM [Editors’ Note: This is Part 5 of a symposium on the recent constitutional amendments affecting the judiciary in Mexico. The introduction to the symposium can be found here. The symposium pieces are cross-posted at ICONnect (in English) and at IberICONnect (in Spanish).
-
Symposium on the Judicial Overhaul in Mexico Part 4: The Mexican Judicial Reform — So What?
—Rodrigo Camarena González, ITAM [Editors’ Note: This is Part 4 of a symposium on the recent constitutional amendments affecting the judiciary in Mexico. The introduction to the symposium can be found here. The symposium pieces are cross-posted at ICONnect (in English) and at IberICONnect (in Spanish).
-
Symposium on the Judicial Overhaul in Mexico Part 3: The Judicial Reform Snowball and the State of Mexican Democracy
—Francisca Pou Giménez, UNAM [Editors’ Note: This is Part 3 of a symposium on the recent constitutional amendments affecting the judiciary in Mexico. The introduction to the symposium can be found here. The symposium pieces are cross-posted at ICONnect (in English) and at IberICONnect (in Spanish).
-
Symposium on the Judicial Overhaul in Mexico Part 1: Judicial Overhaul and Democratic Backsliding in Mexico
—Tania Groppi, University of Siena (Italy)* [Editors’ Note: This is Part 1 of a symposium on the recent constitutional amendments affecting the judiciary in Mexico. The introduction to the symposium can be found here. The symposium pieces are cross-posted at ICONnect (in English) and at IberICONnect (in Spanish).
-
Of Counting Votes, Televised Supreme Court Proceedings, and the Problematic Use of Constitutional Categories—a Rejoinder
—Mariana Velasco-Rivera, National University of Ireland Maynooth, School of Law and Criminology; Co-Editor, IACL Blog. Twitter: @marisconsin. [Editor’s Note: This is one of our ICONnect columns. For more on our 2022 columnists, see here.] In my recent column ‘When Judges Threaten Constitutional Governance: Evidence from Mexico’, I discussed a Supreme Court high-profile case (Acción de Inconstitucionalidad 64/2021) in…
-
Seeing the Whole Picture of the Debate in the Mexican Supreme Court: A Response to “When Judges Threaten Constitutional Governance: Evidence from Mexico”
–Roberto Niembro, General Director of Institutional Relations of the Mexican Supreme Court; UNAM and co-Chair of ICON-S Mexico I write this post in response to the column When Judges Threaten Constitutional Governance: Evidence from Mexico because it wrongly suggests that the application of voting rules by the Chief Justice Arturo Zaldívar during the session of…