Over at Balkinization, Jason Mazzone discusses the need for more diversity on the U.S. Supreme Court. The concept of diversity can be viewed in several ways of course. It has been argued that the U.S. needs Justices from more varied law schools, that there should be more racial diversity on the Court, that the Justices should not possess mainly academic and judicial job experience, etc. Professor Mazzone provocatively suggests that placing a foreigner on the U.S. Supreme Court would be valuable. http://balkin.blogspot.com/2010/11/how-to-really-add-diversity-to-supreme.html Yet this is being done right now elsewhere. For example, I believe Kosovo has three foreign judges on their new Constitutional Court. One of them is a former judge from Minnesota. Moreover, other courts have diversity in the form of law clerks. South African Constitutional Court Justices can generally have one foreign law clerk and are essentially encouraged to do so. While I don’t see Professor Mazzone’s interesting suggestion coming to fruition any time soon, similar approaches are not unprecedented.
More Diversity on the U.S. Supreme Court
Latest
What’s New in Public Law
What’s New in Public Law
Bangladesh in Stasis: No Way Out Without a New Constitution?
Editorial: On My Way Out—Advice to Early Career Scholars VII: Best Practice for Workshopping Projected Edited Collections (Books, Symposia) in 10 Not So Easy Steps
What’s New in Public Law
Comments
2 responses to “More Diversity on the U.S. Supreme Court”
For what it’s worth, Bosnian Constitutional Court has 3 foreign judges.
Mark – Any suggestions on how/where to learn more about the Kosovo Court? Or the Bosnian Court?