Page 19 of 79
1 17 18 19 20 21 79
i_conn_admin – Page 19 – I·CONnect

Blog of the International Journal of Constitutional Law

Author: i_conn_admin

  • What’s New in Public Law

    –Neslihan Çetin, PhD Candidate (University Paris I Panthéon-Sorbonne) –Sonder Li, LL.M. (King’s College London) In this weekly feature, I-CONnect publishes a curated reading list of developments in public law. “Developments” may include a selection of links to news, high court decisions, new or recent scholarly books and articles, and blog posts from around the public…

  • Terms and Conditions of Use

    These terms and conditions of use (“Terms and Conditions”) and the privacy policy (“Privacy Policy”) and other policies linked to at the bottom of the site govern your use of this ICONnect blog, and any content made available from or through the blog located at [www.iconnectblog.com],

  • Accessibility

    Our commitment to accessibility Oxford University Press continuously strives to make its products accessible to and inclusive of all our users, including those with visual, hearing, cognitive, or motor impairments. To support these goals, we follow the general principles of web usability and universal design and, where feasible, endeavour to make the ICONnect accessible to…

  • What’s New in Public Law

    –Amir Cahane, PhD student, Hebrew University of Jerusalem –Carolina Gomide de Araujo, Master’s student, University of São Paulo In this weekly feature, I-CONnect publishes a curated reading list of developments in public law. “Developments” may include a selection of links to news, high court decisions, new or recent scholarly books and articles, and blog posts…

  • Bangladesh One Step Closer to Adopting the Doctrine of Proportionality?

    —Nafiz Ahmed, LL.M. (University of Cambridge); Lecturer, Department of Law, North South University, Dhaka The Supreme Court of Bangladesh (SCBD) has long practiced using the Wednesbury unreasonableness principle to judge the legality of administrative actions and delegated legislation. The Court uses the Wednesbury principle as a tool for substantive judicial review of administrative actions.

  • Free Academics without Academic Freedom?

    —Balázs Majtényi, Eötvös Lorand University (ELTE) Faculty of Social Sciences. Hungary is a land of unfulfilled promises, as it is a member state of the EU and has ratified almost all international human rights documents related to academic freedom. Moreover, the country is located in a geographical region, in Eastern-Central-Europe, where academic freedom has been…

  • Babies, Tires, and Armed Gods Woven Together: The Missing Link in Post-mortem Analysis

    —João Vitor Cardoso, Universidad de Chile** [Editor’s Note: This is one of our ICONnect columns. For more on our 2023 columnists, see here.] “Democratic decay” has become a hot topic. Leading scholars in the field engaged critically with the nature of the threats facing constitutional democracies today, including climate change, religious fundamentalism, globalization, and populism.

  • The “scientific reasonableness” doctrine in the Italian Constitutional Court’s decisions on mandatory vaccinations

    —Micol Pignataro, P.h.D. student in Constitutional Law, University of Bologna, Italy. As we are leaving behind what appears to have been one of the greatest collective traumas our generations have endured in the most recent years, constitutional adjudicators are increasingly engaging with issues concerning the legitimacy of the measures that have been adopted by national…

  • What’s New in Public Law

    —Surbhi Karwa, Lecturer, Jindal Global Law School, India —Yacine Ben Chaabane Mousli, Master’s student, University Paris Panthéon-Assas In this weekly feature, I-CONnect publishes a curated reading list of developments in public law. “Developments” may include a selection of links to news, high court decisions, new or recent scholarly books and articles, and blog posts from…

  • Submit

    We welcome submissions on any subject in public law. These can focus on real-time updateson important new constitutional cases, amendments, constitution-making efforts, orthoughtful analyses of major issues in the field of comparative constitutional law, includingbook reviews, debates and responses to articles that appear in I•CON.